"Snowbeast" is as unoriginal as they come, but still not the worst you can subject yourself too when dealing with low-budget Sasquatch-themed films or 70s made-for-TV horror. It's got it's 'pluses', but at the end of the day it's basically just a "Jaws"-on-land type of thing...
A ski resort is holding some kind of winter carnival where a ferocious yeti just so happens to be lurking around the nearby woods. When skiers start getting plucked off the slopes, the sheriff, a retired ski champion, his wife and her ex are pressured by the resort owner to hunt down the creature and kill it.
There's a few fairly tense moments involving POV shots of the beast spying on doomed skiers and the formula - though obviously familiar - is entertaining enough. That said, there are too many drawn out scenes of people skiing and a sub-plot showing a ridiculous love-triangle between the three central characters. The beast isn't shown a lot aside from it's claw latching onto people and a few very brief glimpses of it's face, such as in a scene where it smashes it's way into a gymnasium full of unsuspecting resort guests which is a disappointingly short burst of Bigfoot action.
Overall, like I said, you could do worse than "Snowbeast". If you like this type of shit - "Jaws"-ish movies like "Grizzly" - you might get a small kick out of this one.
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Hot Love (1985, Jörg Buttgereit)
"Hot Love" is one of the pre-"Nekromantik" shorts that German auteur Jörg Buttgereit did on good ol' super-8 back in "the day". It's a pretty simple, yet highly off-beat little splatter/love story about a guy (Bernd Daktari Lorenz - from "Nekromantik") who meets a chick at a drunken party and they fall madly in love. Through a consciously corny montage of loving attachment and frolicking we see their relationship building into something serious - until, eventually, the dude comes across his woman in the arms of another man (played by the very Aryan looking Buttgereit) and blows his stack. He storms into the room they're about to start fucking in and gets his ass handed to him by his girl's strapping new lover and tossed out. The lovelorn stooge soon follows his ex-girlfriend out into the woods, knocks her out with a branch and rapes her unconscious form. Later on, he's found with his wrists cut and the chick is apparently knocked up... This leads to a pleasantly strange and violent conclusion that just SCREAMS Buttgereit.
The flick is enjoyable. Seeing a baby spawned through rape vomit up a slimy, mangled creature that swiftly murders two people with a whiskey bottle and hatchet was something I thoroughly appreciated. "Hot Love" isn't as "deep" and moody as his later works, such as "Der Todesking" and "Schramm" or even a few of his other early short films I have seen, but it's a worthy little low-budget horror flick to check out.
The flick is enjoyable. Seeing a baby spawned through rape vomit up a slimy, mangled creature that swiftly murders two people with a whiskey bottle and hatchet was something I thoroughly appreciated. "Hot Love" isn't as "deep" and moody as his later works, such as "Der Todesking" and "Schramm" or even a few of his other early short films I have seen, but it's a worthy little low-budget horror flick to check out.
Le nécrophile (2004, Philippe Barassat)
I don't really know what to make of this one. "Le nécrophile" is a weirdo French short film about a bug-eyed wackadoo with a frog tongue he uses to catch insects with and platform shoes that seem to be connected to rickety leg braces. He takes his bicycle out at night and robs graves - taking the bodies back home where he presumably has sex with and eventually eats the remains. He also lives with a young girl whom he clearly feeds the human meat to. There's a suspicious young black boy with a soccer ball who hangs out in the street outside of the necrophile's house who eventually rats him out to the cops...
That sounds like a spoiler, but it's really not. The flick is only like 40 minutes long and is pretty dull, overall. They do this dumb dubbing thing for whenever someone speaks it sounds like trumpets or bird sounds, while a silent film-style French caption pops up on the screen. Obviously, they were going for some kind of 'avant-garde' thing here, but I guess I missed the significance. The film also gets oddly perverse around the end when a young girl is shown lying nude on a table as the necrophile - also nude - climbs on top of her and awkwardly prepares to fuck her. Not sure how old the girl was, but she looked pretty young... In all, I wasn't all that impressed with "Le nécrophile". I'm usually a fan of bizarro "art-house" films, but this one just struck me as silly. Especially with the zombies at the end...
That sounds like a spoiler, but it's really not. The flick is only like 40 minutes long and is pretty dull, overall. They do this dumb dubbing thing for whenever someone speaks it sounds like trumpets or bird sounds, while a silent film-style French caption pops up on the screen. Obviously, they were going for some kind of 'avant-garde' thing here, but I guess I missed the significance. The film also gets oddly perverse around the end when a young girl is shown lying nude on a table as the necrophile - also nude - climbs on top of her and awkwardly prepares to fuck her. Not sure how old the girl was, but she looked pretty young... In all, I wasn't all that impressed with "Le nécrophile". I'm usually a fan of bizarro "art-house" films, but this one just struck me as silly. Especially with the zombies at the end...
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
I Don't Want to Be Born (1975, Peter Sasdy)
A former exotic dancer's newborn doesn't waste any time proving that it's possessed. Turns out, Momma made the mistake of turning down a grabby tap-dancing dwarf she used to share the spotlight with and the inimical little goon puts a hex on her future child, making it strong and evil. The malevolent little dickens lashes out at every one of it's caregivers by scratching them, slapping them and, on more than one occasion, murdering them.
I guess, no matter how possessed an infant actually is, I still have a hard time buying the fact that it can push a nanny into the drink - killing her instantly or decapitate Donald Pleasence with a shovel. Unless we're talking a serious fucking BEAST of a baby like in "It's Alive". Here though, Junior doesn't look like anything other than precious little angel, which was a little disappointing. Also, speaking of disappointing - the lovely Caroline Munro plays a stripper who has NO stripper scenes! What the hell?!
"I Don't Want to Be Born" - also alternately titled "The Devil Within Her" (which, it's BARELY in her at all... Hell, the little shit's born in the first minute and a half) as well as "Sharon's Baby" (her name was Lucy, but whatever...) and "Monster" which is a befittingly boring title - is just a DULL flick. The script is listless and dry and the direction has NO style whatsoever. For a better "Exorcist"/demon-baby-hell spawn film, check out "Beyond the Door".
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Sinister (2012, Scott Derrickson)
"Sinister" was pretty much a disappointment. Not as derivative as I had expected, but it DID tread on VERY familiar ground at a certain point, as I should have assumed it would.
A true-crime writer and his family move into a house where a family was murdered (his family is oblivious) so he can research the case for his latest writing project. While looking in the attic, he discovers a box full of Super-8 reels labeled as to imply they are home movies from the previous residents. Upon viewing the film, he sees that the family merriment captured on the grainy, soundless reels quickly turns into a group murder. The rest of the spools end in similarly macabre fashions - drowning, burning, a lawnmower massacre, etc... Apparently, each family shown being cleverly killed on camera was inexplicably missing ONE child. The writer then notices an eerie, ghoulish figure present in each of the films and attempts to get the bottom of this string of mysterious slayings...
There were some things this movie did well, like the Super-8 murders were shown using sounds from dark-ambient bands, which added a very creepy and atmospheric tone to these scenes. Plus, I NEVER thought I'd hear the Norwegian drone band, Aghast, in a mainstream production! I'll be honest, I was SURPRISED and a bit over-joyed by this one detail. Aside from the music, the performances from Ethan Hawke and Juliet Rylance were quite believable.
On to the negative. The 'creepiness' factor aside from the intermittent "found footage" segments, was pretty weak, mainly due to the excessive use of cliche 'jump scares' (unknown banging noises, some pointlessness involving a kid with night terrors, etc) and the inevitable atrophy into a standard 'kid ghost' culmination. I dunno, I really saw the whole "climax" to this movie as highly 'phoned-in' and cheesy - with the 'ghost children' making the "shhhhh" gesture with their finger up to their lips at the camera. Ugh.
I think "Sinister" COULD have been a really cool supernatural-themed horror flick - possibly along the lines of "Insidious" - if it had just made an attempt at some kind originality in the conclusion. It was just FAR too mundane and predictable. Haven't we had ENOUGH ghost kids at this point? I know we're currently living amongst the "Paranormal Activity" generation who can't get enough "found footage" re-hashings and pale-skinned ghost kids, but when is enough ENOUGH?
A true-crime writer and his family move into a house where a family was murdered (his family is oblivious) so he can research the case for his latest writing project. While looking in the attic, he discovers a box full of Super-8 reels labeled as to imply they are home movies from the previous residents. Upon viewing the film, he sees that the family merriment captured on the grainy, soundless reels quickly turns into a group murder. The rest of the spools end in similarly macabre fashions - drowning, burning, a lawnmower massacre, etc... Apparently, each family shown being cleverly killed on camera was inexplicably missing ONE child. The writer then notices an eerie, ghoulish figure present in each of the films and attempts to get the bottom of this string of mysterious slayings...
There were some things this movie did well, like the Super-8 murders were shown using sounds from dark-ambient bands, which added a very creepy and atmospheric tone to these scenes. Plus, I NEVER thought I'd hear the Norwegian drone band, Aghast, in a mainstream production! I'll be honest, I was SURPRISED and a bit over-joyed by this one detail. Aside from the music, the performances from Ethan Hawke and Juliet Rylance were quite believable.
On to the negative. The 'creepiness' factor aside from the intermittent "found footage" segments, was pretty weak, mainly due to the excessive use of cliche 'jump scares' (unknown banging noises, some pointlessness involving a kid with night terrors, etc) and the inevitable atrophy into a standard 'kid ghost' culmination. I dunno, I really saw the whole "climax" to this movie as highly 'phoned-in' and cheesy - with the 'ghost children' making the "shhhhh" gesture with their finger up to their lips at the camera. Ugh.
I think "Sinister" COULD have been a really cool supernatural-themed horror flick - possibly along the lines of "Insidious" - if it had just made an attempt at some kind originality in the conclusion. It was just FAR too mundane and predictable. Haven't we had ENOUGH ghost kids at this point? I know we're currently living amongst the "Paranormal Activity" generation who can't get enough "found footage" re-hashings and pale-skinned ghost kids, but when is enough ENOUGH?
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Alien From Area-51 (2012, Philip Gardiner)
I've been playing ball with Chemical Burn Entertainment by trying to review at least one film out of each batch they send me and "Alien from Area-51" seemed like the most interesting out of the latest set. I soon became immersed in the WORST documentary I've ever seen concerning the proposed Roswell UFO cover-up. This one specifically spotlights the infamous Alien Autopsy footage that surfaced in the early 90's and was broadcast worldwide in '95. The focus of the documentary are Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, the two limey hoaxsters who perpetuated the world's eagerness to believe that a government conspiracy is surrounding an alien invasion that occured in 1947.
Santilli and Shoefield are two of the most abhorrent charlatans who have ever bolstered a mass lie. The fact that anyone ever believed that these two morons would EVER obtain secretive, authentic government property is absurd - despite them even failing to completely commit to the lie over time, as we see in this documentary. They claim that a portion of the footage had to be "carefully reconstructed" due to deteriorated film stock, while excerpts from the "genuine" footage was used in a few unspecified spots. What? I gotta say, whether you have, say, 8 seconds of alien autopsy footage or even faded STILL PHOTOGRAPHS from authentic footage of an extraterrestrial autopsy - it would be fucking amazing! Why would you need to extend and dilute supposidly "real" documentation of an unbelievable phenominon? Oh, because it's ALL FAKE! Still, a 70 minute documentary had to be made detailing one of the most obvious and uninteresting hoaxes of all time (the "footage", not the entire Roswell fiasco - though I don't buy into that, entirely).
"Alien from Area-51" is one of the most desultory documentaries I've ever seen. It's 70 minutes is padded out with needless CGI animated alien characters, UFO's, and distorted, repetitive rotoscoping. The two buffoons ramble on about their fake film, how they marketed it, and how they truely do believe that we are being prepped for an invasion. I really didn't give a shit about their prolonged opinions on aliens and especially got bored when they dedicated the last 25 mintues to showing the plodding autopsy 'footage'. Just Google "Alien Autopsy Footage" and watch it if you must. If you're interested in learning shit about Roswell and UFO related stuff, just keep and eye out for some History Channel shows or something. Avoid this.
Santilli and Shoefield are two of the most abhorrent charlatans who have ever bolstered a mass lie. The fact that anyone ever believed that these two morons would EVER obtain secretive, authentic government property is absurd - despite them even failing to completely commit to the lie over time, as we see in this documentary. They claim that a portion of the footage had to be "carefully reconstructed" due to deteriorated film stock, while excerpts from the "genuine" footage was used in a few unspecified spots. What? I gotta say, whether you have, say, 8 seconds of alien autopsy footage or even faded STILL PHOTOGRAPHS from authentic footage of an extraterrestrial autopsy - it would be fucking amazing! Why would you need to extend and dilute supposidly "real" documentation of an unbelievable phenominon? Oh, because it's ALL FAKE! Still, a 70 minute documentary had to be made detailing one of the most obvious and uninteresting hoaxes of all time (the "footage", not the entire Roswell fiasco - though I don't buy into that, entirely).
"Alien from Area-51" is one of the most desultory documentaries I've ever seen. It's 70 minutes is padded out with needless CGI animated alien characters, UFO's, and distorted, repetitive rotoscoping. The two buffoons ramble on about their fake film, how they marketed it, and how they truely do believe that we are being prepped for an invasion. I really didn't give a shit about their prolonged opinions on aliens and especially got bored when they dedicated the last 25 mintues to showing the plodding autopsy 'footage'. Just Google "Alien Autopsy Footage" and watch it if you must. If you're interested in learning shit about Roswell and UFO related stuff, just keep and eye out for some History Channel shows or something. Avoid this.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)